[ad_1]
The notices have been despatched to at the very least 14 corporations, together with automakers, FMCG and digital items corporations, ET has learnt.
In a discover ET has seen, the DGGI mentioned the follow is a ‘service’ answerable for taxation underneath GST as that is undertaken by the mum or dad firm to maximise the returns on funding on these subsidiaries. Within the case of MNCs, tax authorities are searching for GST dues from the native unit underneath the reverse cost mechanism.
“We have now found that some corporations weren’t paying tax on the company assure prolonged by them which is answerable for tax underneath the GST through the audit and so tax demand has been raised as per the regulation,” a senior official advised ET.
Whereas the tax demand quantity isn’t very excessive, corporations that obtained such notices have raised objections and are searching for authorized opinion, sources mentioned. Officers estimated the cumulative sum of demand notices despatched within the final two months to be Rs 600-700 crore.
Father or mother corporations extending company ensures for his or her subsidiaries is a standard follow however has been a topic of debate on whether or not it may be construed as a taxable service.
Some tax specialists keep that underneath the GST regulation, companies rendered to a associated social gathering for the furtherance of enterprise are handled as a provide answerable for taxation even when made with no consideration. “Below GST, service is outlined as something apart from items. So, giving a company assure is a service as per regulation and answerable for taxation,” mentioned Saurabh Agarwal, tax associate, EY.
“Secondly, there’s a vested curiosity of a holding firm in giving company ensures for its subsidiary. There’s an oblique profit for the assessee in aiding the subsidiary’s enterprise even when there isn’t any direct compensation,” he mentioned.Another specialists have a special view. “For company ensures to be taxable, within the absence of consideration, the important ingredient is that there have to be an ‘exercise’ and therefore rendition of service. Company ensures don’t contain any aspect of ‘service’ and therefore tax isn’t relevant in such circumstances,” mentioned Abhishek A Rastogi, founding father of Rastogi Chambers.
Up to now, numerous judicial authorities have dominated on the matter of company ensures underneath the service tax regime. In circumstances the place the tax authorities interpreted these ensures to be akin to banking and different monetary service, judicial authorities have dominated in favour of the assessees.
In March this 12 months, the Supreme Courtroom of India noticed within the case of Edelweiss Monetary Providers that service tax was not relevant when a mum or dad firm supplies company ensures for its subsidiaries if there was no consideration concerned. Kulraj Ashpnani, associate at Dhruva Advisors, argues that the scope of provide underneath the GST regulation shouldn’t be stretched to incorporate shareholder features underneath its ambit.
