[ad_1]
In addition to the length of the programme, it desires particulars on the background, authority, types of subsidies, coverage goal or goal and a affirmation whether or not the PMMSY supersedes the Blue Revolution: Built-in Improvement and Administration of Fisheries. The questions have been raised after the WTO members failed to achieve an settlement on fisheries subsidies on the thirteenth ministerial convention in Abu Dhabi final month.
Australia sought affirmation on whether or not one of many aims of PMMSY in relation to marine fishing is particularly to harness tuna assets each in India’s unique financial zone (EEZ) and the excessive seas. EEZs are areas as much as 200 nautical miles from the shore and past which might be the excessive seas. “Australia desires to know the protection of this fisheries plan and if it covers aquaculture in addition to marine seize fishing,” stated an official, who didn’t want to be recognized.
One other set of questions raised by Australia pertains to India’s programme on conversion of trawlers into useful resource particular deep-sea fishing vessels. “Might India please advise what type the funding takes? Might India additionally please affirm that the funding of this mission is ongoing below the PMMSY?” Australia stated.
The PMMSY funds 100% of the price of conversion of backside trawlers into deep sea tuna lengthy liners for which conventional, artisanal fishermen and their societies and associations are eligible.
